Mac
TMTOTH
Today's "Too Much Time On Their Hands" episode is brought to by TUAW: Stick the guts of a modern optical mouse in to a classic Apple ADB mouse.
Dear MacAddict
Thank you so much for the magazines you keep sending, even though we're coming up on the fifth month since my subscription expired. I don't really care about the fact that these "teaser" issues do not contain the CD, as I often found the CDs included with MacAddict to be out of date and the original content mostly useless. The only reason I re-subscribed in the first place was because of the $10 off the regular subscription price offer through Apple's .Mac service. Your magazine hasn't been worth much more than that for a number of years. But feel free to keep the teaser issues coming. I can use the laughs.
Today's miscellany
And thus Apple's plans at world domination were dashed.
Regarding HTML in e-mail: what Tom said. I'm not even an admin like Tom that has to deal with this crap on a day-to-day basis. E-mail is for text. The Web is for graphics. No co-mingling of the two. I realize I'm in a rapidly dwindling minority on this issue, Jeff, but that's my area of Ludditism, I guess.
The Tetran doesn't look too terribly comfortable to be sliding in to one's front pants pocket. [Via Lee.]
I've noticed the severe lack of updates to Apple's iCal Library section, too. Now I just get whatever I want from iCalShare.
Google continues to intrigue me. Really.
I pronounce it like the peanut butter, with a hard J. [Via John.]
Today's miscellany
Yeah, it's been up a few days, but I'm just getting to it, okay? John Gruber has come around, much as I have recently, to the notion of PowerBook-as-main/only-system, a concept Lee has been a proponent of for some time. John also has an in-depth review of the latest 15-inch PowerBook, outfitted just as I would like, with his usual attention to detail. It's Monday evening, and I'm still sore from the neighborhood tree planting from Saturday morning. Eleven ten-gallon trees to go in the neighborhood's greenbelt area. Seventy homes, with an average of two adults per home. Seven people showed up, including myself. Yeah. An interesting tip I picked up from No Plot? No Problem! shows an innovative use for all that spam that gets collected for me. This one writer keeps a list of names that show up in the From field of spam e-mails, so she always has a pool of character names to pull from. I really like this, since usually when I'm working on fiction, I can come up with two or three good character names, then I start really pulling stuff out of bodily orifices. A simple text document in BBEdit now has 305 names, one per line, and the built-in Kill Duplicates filter ensures I don't have the same name twice.
Today's miscellany
I've been trying to send some e-mails with attachments via Gmail, from within Safari. Frustrated, I launched the 1.0b1 version of Camino, and it worked the first time I tried. If Camino could mimic the easy subscribability of Safari when it comes to RSS and Atom feeds, there would be no looking back. Based on my own usage, Camino is consistently faster than Safari at rendering, uses less RAM over time, and remains more stable. Then Tom has to go and remind me why Safari kicks butt when it comes to designing for standards. An article in the latest Macworld has prompted me to look seriously at del.icio.us. My personal work habits have evolved to the point where I'm no longer worried about keeping bookmarks synced between two systems, but the prospect of an online backup of my bookmarks, that I could access from any where, is appealing. I'm coming closer all the time to my own personal death knell for .Mac. Anthro's eNook is so cool it almost makes me wish I didn't have enough space to get one. Almost. A happy belated to Tiffany. Finally, my thanks to Tom. He knows why.
Widgets smidgets
So Leander posits Apple is prepping a WYSIWYG widget-creation app. TUAW's David Chartier whines "what took so long?" I can't help but think, "So what?" I know I'm not alone in minimal widget use. I see the myriad widgets being created and updated daily fly through my RSS feeds, and I can easily imagine users with 20-30 of these things flying around at once, bogging down their system's background process time. At least now to create a widget you have to have some Javascript and HTML knowledge, and it helps if you're design savvy. God help us if "Dashcode" is for real; it will unleash untold useless and ugly widgets on the Mac-using populace. I do see a lot of widgets where I think, "Hey, that would be cool/convenient to have." Then I realize that a particular widget wouldn't be one I would want running all of the time. Then I realize that in the time it takes me to activate Dashboard, go in and make the widget active in the Dashboard environment, and have it refresh, I could just as quickly pull up my web browser and point it to whatever page I needed for the same information. Ah, you say, but what happens when you're using your PhischBook some place where you don't have 'net access? Granted, this is an instance when widgets would be useful, provided the widget itself doesn't require an Internet connection to load its information. For my own use, there's not a non-Internet-using widget out there that I cannot live without. A scenario where such a widget would come in handy when I am without Internet access has not arisen, and even if it had, I believe it would be for something that could just as well keep until I had access again. I probably activate Dashboard between eight and a dozen times a day. For the record, the widgets I run: + Dictionary, Phone Book, Stocks, and Weather, all widgets that come with Mac OS X Tiger + SysStat + Backpack + BibleSearch + DailyVerse + Scoreboard, during baseball season I had been using iCal Events, but I'm giving MenuCalendarClock for iCal a try, and am attempting to determine which one I like better for everyday use. Your thoughts on widgets? What are you running? Drop a note in the comments.
C-Command Blog
Michael now has a dedicated blog for C-Command products. Since the illustrious Mr. Tsai has not yet posted feed links, allow me to help you out: RSS, or if you prefer, Atom. [Big wave of the phin to Lee for the pointers to the feed links.]
ATPM 11.11
The November issue of About This Particular Macintosh is now available for your reading pleasure. I'm wondering if Charles Anthony's cover art will be the last to feature the Power Mac G5. Daniel Jalkut, of Red Sweater Blog, was kind enough to contribute this month's Pod People column. We are actively seeking new iPod stories each month, and if you would like to share yours, please [e-mail the editors](mailto:editor@atpm.com?Subject=Pod People). In this month's FileMaking, Chuck Ross takes a break from the usual how-to to examine the new features of FileMaker 8. Sylvester Roque sets up a Mac music server, while Matthew Glidden upgrades his Cube's video card. I've performed the latter operation myself, though instead of the Radeon Matt uses, I went with a nVidia GeForce2 MX. Lee Bennett is kind enough to share with us his photos of the Gateway Arch in St. Louis as this month's desktop pictures selection. I especially like numbers four and eight. In Cortland, Chad Wieser finds himself beginning a new phase in life, while Cortland collects the last of a client's bill. Frisky Freeware notes the return of a Classic classic: FinderPop! Turly O'Connor is porting the venerable productivity app to OS X, and I'm looking forward to putting it through its paces. I've been thinking that I wouldn't get as much use out of FinderPop now, since I use Quicksilver, but I'm also thinking of the two apps as compliments rather than competitors. For those times when you're mousing around, it's easier to activate FinderPop, rather than going to the keyboard with both hands for Quicksilver. Yours truly shares the review spotlight with my fellows this month. Lee puts the AirClick and AirClick USB from Griffin Technology through their paces, while Matthew goes behind enemy lines with the Commandos Battle Pack. Tom Bridge examines the third edition of Derrick Story's excellent Digital Photography Pocket Guide. Eric Blair gives OmniGraffle Professional 4 a workout, while I chime in with a look at RadTech's Portectorz for the 12-inch PowerBook. We still have openings on the editorial staff, and we are always looking for new writers, and need new cover art each month. If you are interested in volunteering some time to ATPM in any of these areas, please e-mail the editors.
It <i>is</i> about time...
With thanks to John for the post title and link: Rich Siegel, of Bare Bones fame, is finally blogging. As if it weren't enough that Rich is responsible for two of the applications I use the most each day, he is a fellow scotch and peanut butter lover. Rich, drop me a line when you're in Dallas; there's 12-year Glenfiddich Special Reserve in the pantry.
Apple's new iron and bits
So yesterday was the latest in a slew of product announcements from Apple. In just over a month, we've seen the iPod nano, the iPod with Video, the new iTunes Music Store from whence you can download videos and television shows for your video iPod, and now new Power Macs, PowerBooks, and a new piece of pro software. Power Macs The new Power Macs are slower than the ones they replace--from a clock-speed perspective, anyway. And let's be honest: most people don't understand how a dual-core 2.5 GHz processor is faster than a non-dual-core 2.7 or 3 GHz processor. They see numbers. They understand numbers. The higher the number, the faster it must be. So Apple has a bit of education to do for users, who aren't as hip and in-the-know as you or I when it comes to the technobabble, contemplating new Power Macs. Then again, maybe those sorts of people are just better off with an iMac or a Mac mini. Every gearhead, yours truly included, of course is lusting after the dual-core, dual-processor 2.5 GHz Power Mac. This means there are four cores on two chips, and is why Apple refers to this beast as the "Quad." Should you care to shell out as much money for two video cards--the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500, with 512 MB of SDRAM--as the Quad costs, you can drive four 30-inch Cinema Displays from a single box. Every gearhead, yours truly included, is also lusting after the funds to accomplish this. I can barely fathom having two of those 30-inch monsters on my desk, much less four, and I would be in happy-happy dream land with only one. PowerBooks While it's fun to have fantasies about high-end desktop hardware, I was realistically focused on the new PowerBooks. The missus mentioned the possibility of new mobile iron after the first of the year, so I was hoping to see some improvements, given that this may be the last revision of PowerPC-based 'Books before Intel-based hardware ships. I was disappointed that the line-up didn't see a speed bump. It would have been nice to get a 1.8 GHz PowerBook. The added pixels in the 15- and 17-inch models are indeed welcome, though the 15-inch's resolution is now higher than the 19-inch LCD I would normally hook it up to. Right now, my 12-inch PowerBook--with a resolution of 1024x768--drives the 19-inch panel, with its resolution of 1280 x 1024. My normal habit is to run the PowerBook closed, given the extra real estate on the 19-inch LCD. With one of the new PowerBook models, I'm looking at the prospect of reordering my workspace, so the PowerBook could be run in extended-desktop mode with the LCD. This is certainly not a bad thing. John notes the simplified line-up of the PowerBook models, and I concur this is a good thing. I wonder, though, if the simplified product line-up isn't so much a result of Apple's desire for simplification, but rather the aforementioned fact that there are no speed-bumps. Historically, when you saw the different versions of a PowerBook, other than screen size, there was a processor speed difference as well. With yesterday's announcement, Apple killed the slower-speed model for the 15- and 17-inch PowerBooks.That notwithstanding, again, I agree; the simplified line-up is much better. When I went to price a new 15-inch, I only made one change, the hard drive. (I'll buy my 2 gigs of RAM elsewhere and save a few hundred bucks, Apple, thanks.) Aperture Likely the main reason I'm gear-lusting after a Power Mac G5 Quad is because I'm also lusting after Apple's latest piece of pro software, Aperture. Think Final Cut Pro for digital photographers. (I know I read that phrase somewhere, but haven't been able to recall where yet.) I wasn't crazy about the name at first, thinking Tom had come up with a much better one, but it's growing on me. Aperture is a one-stop shop of digital photo post-production, and while it is geared toward--and priced for--professional photographers, as a burgeoning "prosumer," I can see how much I would gain from Aperture's abilities. Alas, none of my current hardware can handle the app, and while I know I will begin pushing the limits of iPhoto in the near future, I'm not there yet. Many see Aperture as a shot across Adobe's bow, and while I'm sure it will steal some screen time from Photoshop, I see the two applications working in complement with one another rather than competition. Given what Aperture brings to the table, Adobe is going to have to look at something other than just workflow solutions for Photoshop. Their flagship application is already suffering from featuritis, with no real room to grow except through the implementation of workflow solutions, so future development should be interesting to watch. Regarding the new Apple hardware, Leander Kahney remarked, "I actually don't like product announcements like this. It makes my 18-month-old PowerBook and G5 look feeble and decrepit." Leander, I'm plugging along on a 4.5-year old Cube and 2-year old 12-inch PowerBook. How do you think I feel?
Keep your iCal window the same size
King of Mac OS X Hints Rob Griffiths has a great tip for keeping your iCal window the same size no matter which view (Day, Week, Month) you're using. Very handy.
Why stock analysts are worthless
(Alternative title: There's an reason the word "anal" is in "analyst") Apple quadruples its profit, but the stock takes a ten percent-plus dive because the company "missed" the number of iPod sales stock analysts --who are not employees of Apple, do not sit on the Board of Directors, and who are not Apple executives-- said they thought the company should have sold? They sold 6.4 million iPods in a three months. How many Rios did Creative sell in the last three months? Oh, that's right, they canned that music player. Hold on, it gets better. Those same analysts, who are poo-pooing Apple for failing to sell as many iPods as the analysts thought they should have sold, seem to think Delphi is a good buy. No wonder monkeys are just as good at the stock market as these guys. [With thanks to John Gruber, and Matt Deatherage and W.R. Wing on the MacJournals-Talk list.]
That smart FontExplorer
So like a lot of the Macintosh-using world, I've been dinking around with Linotype's FontExplorer X, and I like it. I used Suitcase when I worked in the graphic design support world, and it was a good app, but always felt cumbersome. Not so with FontExplorer X. Jon Armstrong notes the use of the app's Smart Set feature, and I can see myself taking advantage of this quickly. Being able to sort fonts in to their own foundry sets is at the top of my list. I'm curious to see how many Fontosaurus types I still have kicking around. (Go, buy from Dan, support a one-man font shop.)
More on the NetNewsWire acquisition
Tom's not happy with Brent and Sheila's sale of NetNewsWire to NewsGator. I'm going to chalk it up to the fact that he's literally on drugs. If you've spent any time on the Ranchero beta lists, exchanged e-mail with Brent, or read his blog posts on development, you know Mr. Simmons does not go off half-cocked with major business and development decisions. Despite Tom's dislike of NewsGator, I'm sure Brent and Sheila were quite careful with whom they chose to sell NetNewsWire. After all, this company is Brent's new employer. He would have to be convinced the company would foster the sort of development environment in which he would have the freedom to make NetNewsWire all it could be. As he notes, there are things he's wanted to do with NNW that he has been able to not get to, having to deal with the business and support aspects of being an independent software developer. By going in-house with NewsGator, Brent is now free from those other constraints, absent anything he may wish to do on the side with Ranchero's other products that NewsGator did not purchase. With regard to NetNewsWire, all Brent has to worry about right now is programming. One would reasonably believe this is a Very Good Thing™. I have no opinion about NewsGator, as a company or with regard to any of its products. They have never been on my radar before. Perhaps Tom knows something I do not, but again, I believe Brent would have done his research regarding the company before making such a commitment. With regard to selling out to Apple, I don't see that ever happening. Apple's nod to RSS is the feature built in to Safari. I don't see a standalone news reader in Apple's future, nor do I see Apple devoting the depth of features you can find in NetNewsWire in to the RSS cabinet of Safari. In the end, it appears this is a good thing for the Simmons, and a good thing for Mac users. NetNewsWire simply rules the news reader market, on any platform. No doubt this is the number-one reason NewsGator was interested in it, and I don't see any other product, much less an open-source initiative, knocking it from that perch any time soon.
Brent and Sheila sell out
Gruber points out that Ranchero Software has sold NetNewsWire to NewsGator. Big, big news in the Macintosh community it is. It appears this is a good move for Brent and Sheila Simmons, and will not affect NetNewsWire aficionados, yours truly included. I am a little concerned about MarsEdit, which Brent says, in the above-linked interview, they are searching for a new home for. I'm sure Brent will take some heat from certain zealots in the Mac blogosphere and beyond, but he will get none from me. He and Sheila have to do what's best for them, and by throwing in with NewsGator, it would appear the sky is suddenly the limit. Our best wishes to the Simmons, and we eagerly await the next version of NetNewsWire! Update, 9:35 PM CST: Gruber notes the post in Brent's blog regarding the acquisition.
ATPM 11.10
The October issue of About This Particular Macintosh is now available. Ellyn ponders the day we watch movies on our mobile phones, while Wes covers the fact that our mobiles are now playing music, thanks to the iTunes-compatible ROKR from Motorola. He also looks at the incredible iPod Nano, file formats, OS X UI, and other bits from the Mac blogosphere. Ted takes TAO and OmniOutliner Pro head to head, while Chuck's FileMaking rolls on with Common Functions. ATPM reader Mark Dickson is gracious in sharing photos from his June trip to Italy as this month's desktop pictures selection. In this month's Cortland, the Lisa returns, and Terry is targeted by...well, some people you think you know. Frisky notes backup freeware PsyncX. On the reviews front, Johann examines Airfoil's audio hijacking and broadcasting capabilities (when paired with an Airport Express Base Station). Chris Lawson tries out Business Card Composer, and puts the Mercury Elite-AL Pro RAID through its paces. Michael compares two disk catalogers, Catalog and CDFinder. I used to use Disk Tracker, but eventually got out of the disk/CD cataloging habit. Now that my digital photo collection is growing by leaps and bounds, there is a need to pick that habit up again, and this review helped. Finally, Tom tells our readers what he thinks of the new iPod nano. As always, the publication is available in three fruity flavors for your reading enjoyment.
It must be .Mac renewal time
Matt Deatherage used the above line as the title for an e-mail on the MacJournals-Talk list, and he's right. You usually don't see updates and new features added to .Mac until fall arrives. You can read the gory details, but the gist is .Mac members now get 1 GB of storage, split between mail and data, there's a new version of Backup, and .Mac members can now congregrate in to groups. As of five minutes ago, looking at my iDisk space inside the .Mac preference pane, I saw it was still at 200 MB. I logged in to my .Mac Account Settings, and it reflects the 1 GB increase. You will have to click on the Storage Settings button to see the change reflected in your e-mail/iDisk breakdown. Quitting System Preferences, then relaunching and clicking on the .Mac pref pane will have the storage update reflected there. I have been debating renewing my .Mac subscription, and these updates really don't change much for me. I'm not ready to transition everything in the next 12 days, when my account is set to renew, so I'll be a .Mac member for at least another year. Watch for an upcoming post about .Mac value.